Katarn07 said:
Nah, Maul served his purpose. Dooku was a better fleshed out villain. If anything, Dooku. should have been in TPM as a Jedi so seeing him in AotC as a villain would be more of a shock.
And I honestly don't get the hate for Jar Jar. I never have and never will hate him. The prequels suffer for many more reasons than this goof-ball character of a character.
Because it's very simple. The summer of 1999 had Darth Maul's ugly tattooed mug painted on ever surface imaginable. Everywhere you looked those dreamy sunset yellow eyes were piercing your soul. He was billed as the new Darth Vader, the prequel trilogy villain to end all villains. With this huge emphasis upon his character, it left this impression that he’d be sticking around for a while. That he’d be vital!
Upon walking out of the theater…it’s revealed that Darth Maul doesn’t enter the story until halfway through, he has somewhere around three lines of dialogue, give or take he has about 30 minutes of screen time, and then he’s iced like the expendable disappointment he was. He was almost entirely a walking and (not so much) talking gimmick for fight scenes. A cheap and superficial thrill. His lacking of character was in and of itself his character. I went in thinking this guy would actually be (dare I say) cooler then even Darth Vader himself. I walked out thinking he wasn’t even the same galaxy.
Boba Fett was never intended to be vital to SW. You may argue that changed with AOTC’s, but I’m talking conceptually. He’s there for one basic (but vital) plot point; Take Captain Solo to Jabba the Hutt. His helmet never showered grocery/department store aisles. We already had an established arch nemesis for the story. Boba Fett was a glorified extra, but that’s what gave him his popularity. The prequels would have benefited with quality over quality…but instead we’re given a mass amount of cool-looking yet more-or-less shallow main villains. The prequels deserved an intelligent, in-depth, and fleshed-out major villain.